Treatment of L5-S1 Floating Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation with Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The floating calcified tissue in floating calcified lumbar disc herniation (FCLDH) is hard and often adheres to the dura mater, which can easily cause nerve root damage during surgery, making the operation challenging. We proposed the classification of FCLDH and a new technique for removing floating calcified tissue and reported the clinical efficacy and safety of this new technique in clinical practice. METHODS: From January 2019 to October 2021, 24 patients (13 males and 11 females, 46.4 ± 7.72 years) with L5-S1 floating calcified lumbar disc herniation were treated with percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). According to FCLDH classification, a total of Type Ia: nine cases, Type Ib: five cases, Type IIa: four cases, and Type IIa: six cases were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded pre-operatively and 3 days postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. The postoperative curative effect was evaluated according to the modified MacNab criteria. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine were performed 3 days after surgery to evaluate the efficacy of the surgery. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent PEID. The VAS and ODI scores at 3 days postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up were significantly improved and statistically significant compared to those of the preoperative period (p < 0.05). All the patients were followed up for 12-24 months (mean, 16.6 ± 4.6 months). At the last follow-up, according to the modified MacNab criteria, 15 cases were excellent, eight were good, and one was fair. The combined excellent and good rate was 95.83% (23/24). Postoperative review revealed that all floating calcified tissues were effectively removed and the nerve roots were adequately decompressed without complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and lumbar spine infection. CONCLUSION: The classification of FCLDH we proposed can well guide the selection of surgical plans. PEID combined with floating calcified tissue removal technology has good efficacy in the treatment of L5-S1 FCLDH, ensuring accurate removal of calcified tissue, reducing complications and improving the quality of life of affected individuals.

[Advances in surgical strategies for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament involving the C 2 segment].

Objective: To evaluate the application of surgical strategies for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving the C 2 segment. Methods: The literature about the surgery for cervical OPLL involving C 2 segment was reviewed, and the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of surgery were summarized. Results: For cervical OPLL involving the C 2 segments, laminectomy is suitable for patients with OPLL involving multiple segments, often combined with screw fixation, and has the advantages of adequate decompression and restoration of cervical curvature, with the disadvantages of loss of cervical fixed segmental mobility. Canal-expansive laminoplasty is suitable for patients with positive K-line and has the advantages of simple operation and preservation of cervical segmental mobility, and the disadvantages include progression of ossification, axial symptoms, and fracture of the portal axis. Dome-like laminoplasty is suitable for patients without kyphosis/cervical instability and with negative R-line, and can reduce the occurrence of axial symptoms, with the disadvantage of limited decompression. The Shelter technique is suitable for patients with single/double segments and canal encroachment >50% and allows for direct decompression, but is technically demanding and involves risk of dural tear and nerve injury. Double-dome laminoplasty is suitable for patients without kyphosis/cervical instability. Its advantages are the reduction of damage to the cervical semispinal muscles and attachment points and maintenance of cervical curvature, but there is progress in postoperative ossification. Conclusion: OPLL involving the C 2 segment is a complex subtype of cervical OPLL, which is mainly treated through posterior surgery. However, the degree of spinal cord floatation is limited, and with the progress of ossification, the long-term effectiveness is poor. More research is needed to address the etiology of OPLL and to establish a systematic treatment strategy for cervical OPLL involving the C 2 segment.

Comparison of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with pediculoplasty for Kümmell's disease: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with pediculoplasty (PVP-PP) for Kümmell's disease (KD). METHODS: Between February 2017 and November 2020, 76 patients with KD undergoing PVP or PVP-PP were included in this retrospective study. Based on the PVP whether combined with pediculoplasty, those patients were divided into PVP group (n = 39) and PVP-PP group (n = 37). The operation duration, estimated blood loss, cement volume, and hospitalization stays were recorded and analyzed. Meanwhile, the radiological variations including the Cobb's angle, anterior height of index vertebra, and middle height of index vertebra from X-ray were recorded preoperatively, at 1 days postoperatively and the final follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were also evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative recovery values of these data were compared. RESULTS: The two groups showed no significant difference in demographic features (p > 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time of hospital stay revealed no sharp statistical distinctions either (p > 0.05), except that PVP-PP used more bone cement than PVP (5.8 ± 1.5 mL vs. 5.0 ± 1.2 mL, p < 0.05). The anterior and middle height of vertebra, Cobb's angle, VAS, and ODI was observed a little without significant difference between the two groups before and 1 days postoperatively (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, ODI and VAS scores decreased significantly in the PVP-PP group than in the PVP group at follow-up (p < 0.001). The PVP-PP group exhibited a slight amelioration in Ha, Hm, and Cobb's angle when compared to the PVP group, displaying statistical significance (p < 0.05). No significant disparity in cement leakage was observed between the PVP-PP and PVP groups (29.4% vs. 15.4%, p > 0.05). It is worth noting that the prevalence of bone cement loosening displayed a remarkable decrement within the PVP-PP group, with only one case recorded, as opposed to the PVP group's seven cases (2.7% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both PVP-PP and PVP can relieve pain effectively in patients with KD. Moreover, PVP-PP can achieve more satisfactory results than PVP. Thus, compared with PVP, PVP-PP is more suitable for KD without neurological deficit, from a long-term clinical effect perspective.